It is difficult to re-educate people who have been brought up on nationalism to the
\nidea of relinquishing part of their sovereignty to a supra-national body.
\n~Bilderberg Group founder, Prince Bernhard~
\nAs a rhetorical question, can someone please explain to me how it is that progressive
\nliberals such as John Edwards and Hillary Clinton, as well as do-gooder
\nhumanitarians with multiple social projects ongoing such as the Rockefellers and
\nevery Royal House in Europe, can perennially attend Bilderberg meetings apparently
\nknowing that the final objective of this despicable group of hoodlums is a fascist One
\nWorld Empire?
\n~Daniel Estulin (P.318)~
\nDaniel Estulin is a Madrid-based journalist and an investigative reporter who took on
\nthe daunting and dangerous task of researching the Bildeberg Group, and who offers
\nhis findings in The True Story Of The Bilderberg Group, recently published by Trine
\nDay. Equally intriguing as his harrowing tales of being followed and nearly killed on a
\ncouple of occasions while working on the book, is the manner in which Estulin
\nconnects the dots between the Bilderberg Group, world events, notable politicians and
\ncorporate tycoons and the two other secretive monsters of the ruling elite, the Council
\non Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission (TC). The project lasted
\nfifteen years and was motivated by Estulin’s curiosity about how it is that the
\nmainstream media has never covered in depth the meetings of the Bilderberg Group
\nwhose combined wealth exceeds the combined wealth of all U.S. citizens.
\nWhat Estulin’s book makes clear is that the group, along with the CFR and TC, has
\nbecome a shadow government whose top priority is to erase the sovereignty of all
\nnation-states and supplant them with global corporate control of their economies under
\nthe surveillance of “an electronic global police state.” (xv)
\nThe author emphasizes that not all members of the group are “bad” people, and he
\nimplies that membership is structured somewhat like concentric circles in a target
\nscheme with in inner core and various levels of relationship between that core and the
\nouter circles of membership. Almost every famous player in politics and finance in the
\nworld is a member of one of the three organizations mentioned above, and their
\npolitical affiliations range from liberal to conservative, for example, George W. Bush,
\nGeorge Soros, Gerald Ford, George McGovern, Jimmy Carter. Of this private club,
\nEstulin says:
\nThis parallel world remains unseen in the daily struggles of most of humanity, but,
\nbelieve me, it is there: a cesspool of duplicity and lies and double-speak and innuendo
\nand blackmail and bribery. It is a surreal world of double and triple agents, of
\nchanging loyalties, of professional psychotic assassins, brainwashed black ops agents,
\nsoldiers of fortune and mercenaries, whose primary sources of income are the dirtiest
\nand most despicable government-run subversive missions-the kind that can never be
\nexposed.(15)
\nThis world, according to Estulin, is so perverse and evil that “it has left an indelible
\nmark on my soul”. (16) How not? Because the Bilderberg Group and its two other
\ntriplets, the CFR and the TC have set about to loot the entire planet. Their members
\nrun the central banks of the world and are poised to control discount rates, moneysupply,
\ninterest rates, gold prices, and which countries receive or do not receive loans.
\nMembership is by invitation only, many of the earliest members being handpicked, not
\nfrom right-wing groups but from among none other than the Fabian Socialists who
\nultimately supported global government.
\nAnother chilling quote Estulin includes is from William Shannon:
\nThe Bilderbergers are searching for the age of post-nationalism: when we won’t have
\ncountries, but rather regions of the Earth surrounded by Universal values. That is to
\nsay, a global economy; one World government (selected rather than elected) and a
\nuniversal religion. To assure themselves of reaching these objectives, the
\nBilderbergers focus on a \u2018greater technical approach’ and less awareness on behalf of
\nthe general public.
\nTHE BILDERBERG BAPTISM OF BILL CLINTON
\nIn 1991 Bill Clinton attended the Bilderberg Conference in Baden-Baden where
\nEstulin asserts that he was “anointed” to the U.S. presidency, and shortly thereafter he
\ntook an unexpected, unannounced trip to Moscow. It appears, says Estulin, that he was
\nsent there to get his KGB student-era, anti-Vietnam war files “buried” before he
\nannounced his candidacy for president which happened some two-and-a-half months
\nlater. Today, Clinton is a member of all three groups: Bilderberg, CFR, and TC.
\nHillary Clinton is a member of the Bilderberg Group.
\nEstulin points out that “almost all of the presidential candidates for both parties have
\nbelonged to at least one of these organizations, many of the U.S. congressmen and
\nsenators, most major policy-making positions, especially in the field of foreign
\nrelations, much of the press, most of the leadership of the CIA, FBI, IRS, and many of
\nthe remaining governmental organizations in Washington. CFR members occupy
\nnearly all White House cabinet positions.”(80) When one considers that most
\nprominent members of mainstream media are also members of what Edith Kermit
\nRoosevelt, granddaughter of Theodore Roosevelt called “this legitimate Mafia”, how
\ncan we assert that Americans obtain their news from independent sources?
\nFor example, The News Hour with Jim Leher is the cornerstone of PBS’s
\nprogramming. Leher is a CFR member, and when one examines the funding of the
\nnews hour by: Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) whose chairman Dwayne Andreas was
\na member of the Trilateral Commission; Pepsico, whose CEO Indra Krishnamurthy
\nNooyi is a Bilderberger and TC Executive Committee member; and Smith Barney
\nwhich is interlocked with Citigroup, a global financial services company that is a
\nmember of the Bilderberg Group, the CFR, and the TC, what kind of “news” should
\none expect from Leher’s News Hour? Consider also that many of the journalists on the
\nNews Hour: Paul Gigot, David Gergen, William Kristol, and William Safire are
\nmembers of one or more of the three groups. (153)
\nLikewise, when we consider the membership in one or more of these groups of almost
\nevery American president since the inception of these organizations, we can no longer
\npretend that any Democratic or Republican presidential candidate offers the American
\npeople an alternative to ruling elite global hegemony.
\nIn fact, Estulin’s research reveals that “the Council on Foreign Relations creates and
\ndelivers psycho-political operations by manipulating people’s reality through a \u2018tactic
\nof deception’, placing Council members on both sides of an issue. The deception is
\ncomplete when the public is led to believe that its own best interests are being served
\nwhile the CFR policy is being carried out.”(117)
\nAnd what happens if the “anointed ones” become too autonomous? One chapter in the
\nbook, “The Watergate Con-Game”, answers that question. In it Estulin suggests that
\nRichard Nixon was set up by the Council on Foreign Relations of which he was a
\nmember because of his insubordination and unwillingness to submit to the shadow
\ngovernment. Presumably, Nixon’s demise was carefully crafted to demonstrate to
\nsubsequent Chief Executives the price they would pay for disregarding the agenda of
\nthose who anointed them.
\nTHAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW
\nIn the book’s final pages, Estulin’s research waxes increasingly relevant to the present
\nmoment in history. He asks: “Why would David Rockefeller and other U.S.
\nTrilateralists, Bilderbergers and the CFR members want to dismantle the industrial
\nmight of the United States?” (184). He then launches into a summary of the economic
\nhistory of the twentieth century and makes one of the most powerful statements of the
\nentire book: “What we have witnessed from this \u2018cabal’ is the gradual collapsing of the
\nU.S. economy that began in the 1980s.” (187)
\nIn case you haven’t noticed, this “gradual collapse of the U.S. economy” is no longer
\ngradual, and what Estulin is asserting confirms a great deal of the assertions made by
\nCatherine Austin Fitts that the current housing bubble explosion\/credit runch\/mortgage
\nmeltdown has its roots in the 1980s. James Howard Kunstler has also written recently
\nin his blog entitled “Shock and Awe” that the great American yard sale has begun. In
\nother words, as an engineered economic meltdown drives hundreds of thousands and
\neventually millions of businesses and individuals into bankruptcy, key players in the
\nBig Three ruling elite organizations can buy up the train wreck left behind for pennies
\non the dollar-a brilliant fast-track strategy for owning the world.
\nIn the final months of 2007 we are witnessing the stupendous success of the Big
\nThree’s strategy for planetary economic hegemony as the cacophony of their carefully
\nengineered global economic cataclysm reverberates across America and around the
\nworld. It was never about buyers who didn’t read the fine print when taking out liar
\nloans. It was always about silver-tongued, ruling elite politicians and central bankers,
\nanointed by the shadow government, who ultimately and skillfully stole and continue
\nto steal governments from people and replace them with transnational corporations.
\nNo one could have said it better than David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral
\nCommission, a Bilderberg member and board member of the Council On Foreign
\nRelations in his Memoirs:
\nSome even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of
\nthe United States, characterizing my family and me as \u2018internationalists’ and of
\nconspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political
\nand economic structure-one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I
\nam proud of it.
\nIf you want to know who really runs the world and the lengths to which they will go to
\nestablish their globalist hegemony, you must read Estulin’s well-documented The True
\nStory of The Bilderberg Group.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It is difficult to re-educate people who have been brought up on nationalism to the idea of relinquishing part of their sovereignty to a supra-national body. ~Bilderberg Group founder, Prince Bernhard~ As a rhetorical question, can someone please explain to me how it is that progressive liberals such as John Edwards and Hillary Clinton, as … <\/p>\n