{"id":9,"date":"2008-11-30T21:27:54","date_gmt":"2008-12-01T05:27:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/?page_id=9"},"modified":"2008-12-31T18:14:53","modified_gmt":"2008-12-31T10:14:53","slug":"the-truth-about-911","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/?page_id=9","title":{"rendered":"the TRUTH about 9\/11"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

In trying to piece together what really happened on September 11, a lot of work has been done \u2014
\nmuch of it useful and interesting \u2014 into those ‘hijacked’ flights for which the publicly-available
\nevidence is sketchy and contradictory. There are web sites for instance wholly dedicated to
\ninvestigating the true fate of Flight 93 and others that attempt to get a clearer idea of what really
\nhappened at the Pentagon. Both these incidents however are characterised by a pronounced
\nabsence of substantive material evidence and it is this, I suppose, that raises our suspicions and
\ncuriosity.
\nThere is one flight however that has received insufficient attention and this is American Airlines
\nFlight 11, the plane that allegedly crashed into WTC1, the North Tower. It was the first of the
\nterrorist attacks that day. It has been a big mistake not to subject this flight to the same kind of
\nscrutiny as the others because, unlike the others, a very good and important piece of documentary
\nevidence of this flight exists in the public domain. This is the so-called ‘Fireman’s Video’ and we
\nreally haven’t looked at it closely enough. It really does deserve a second look.
\nThe story of the ‘Fireman’s Video’ is well known. Two
\nFrench filmmakers, the Naudet Brothers, were in New York
\non September 11 making a documentary about the New
\nYork Fire Service. The footage shows that, while filming in
\nCanal Street, firemen and crew are distracted by a plane
\nflying low overhead. The camera operator instinctively
\nturns his camera towards the North Tower and, for little
\nmore than a second or so, we get a clear view of the plane
\ncrashing into the tower. It is a precious, priceless second. It
\nis the one-second of video that really makes the sinister
\nBush junta nervous. It really gives them nightmares. They
\nreally didn’t want a professional cameraman to catch that moment on broadcast-quality tape.
\nIf you’ve got it on tape I strongly suggest you take another look at it, with the pause and
\nframe-forward buttons at the ready. If you don’t have it taped you can purchase the documentary
\nin which it appears on video and DVD. It’s called simply ‘9\/11’.
\nWhen seen at full speed, you might first of all think that there isn’t a great deal to see. There’s
\nhalf a second or so when we see the plane flying through the air then it smashes into the tower,
\ncreating an explosion and leaving a great gash across the building. Notice though that
\nimmediately before it hits the building the plane emits a brief, bright flash. Notice too that the
\nscar it leaves on the building is rather larger than seems appropriate for the size of the aircraft.
\nNow pause the sequence at the beginning and advance it frame by frame. Firstly, look at the
\nplane. Does that look like a Boeing jet to you? Is its wingspan wide enough? Does it have
\nengines attached to its wings? These however are but minor details compared with what comes
\nnext. Watch carefully what happens as the plane approaches and crashes into the tower. I leave
\nyou to come to your own conclusions about what you see (watch it over and over again,
\nbackwards and forwards), but I’ll tell you what I see. Immediately before the plane strikes it fires
\nhttp:\/\/www.serendipity.li\/wot\/aa11.htm
\n2 of 5
\na missile that blows a hole in the building’s fa\u00e7ade. This is the cause of that brief flash. The plane
\nthen begins to disappear neatly into this hole, leaving no wing impressions. (A plane
\ndisappearing into a hole? Where have I heard that before; wasn’t there something about a plane at
\nthe Pentagon?) Just before it disappears however it fires two more missiles from somewhere near
\nits tail. One goes to the left, one to the right (and up a bit) and it is the blast holes from these
\nthree separate missiles that form the great gash across the building.
\nThere’s more. Keep an eye on the adjacent east side of
\nthe building, which is also visible. See how, a few
\nframes into the explosion, a white jet of smoke erupts out
\nof the east side at the same level as the plane. The jet
\ncomes straight out of the wall at right angles to it, not
\nangled in accordance with the trajectory of the plane.
\nAlso it’s just white smoke and dust, no orange flames or
\nanything like that. It is clearly a bomb going off, creating
\nthe gash that appears on the east wall.
\nI know what I am describing sounds incredible. I suggest
\nonly that you look at the footage yourself and come to
\nyour own conclusions about what you see.
\nThe plane that hit the North Tower was not American Airlines Flight 11. It was not a Boeing
\n767. It was a custom-built military plane carrying three missiles that created the impression of a
\nplane crash without leaving any wreckage. In order for it precisely to strike the correct part of the
\ntower (in line with the bomb already planted in the east wall) it must have been flown remotely
\nusing cruise navigation. I believe a similar plane was used to strike the Pentagon.
\nThe ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ have got it dead right this time. The true Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93
\nwere indeed substituted with other planes when the transponders were switched off. Someone
\nhijacked the hijackers to make sure the job was done properly.
\nThe ‘Fireman’s Video’ is Bush’s true smoking gun. It is in the public domain and it is even
\navailable on DVD. It is probably sitting in the video shelves of thousands and thousands of
\nhomes across the world. It is vitally important that the American people see this video frame by
\nframe so they can make their own minds up about what really happened on September 11.
\nThere has been a silent coup in America but few have noticed yet. The Bush Administration is
\nclearly very sinister indeed and God only knows what it has in store for us next. There is a clue
\nthough in the things of which it accuses Saddam Hussein: building and using weapons of mass
\ndestruction (nuclear and biological) and killing his own people. When Bush describes Saddam he
\nis describing himself.
\nWe have entered the Age of the Conjurer and it is going to be a tricky time. The 9-11 stunt was a
\nhuge magic trick and we all bought it at first. Magicians can be very convincing. You have to
\nlook very hard to see the trick and not be fooled. On this occasion slow motion exposes the
\nsleight of hand, but remember how the magician works: he can make almost anything seem real
\nif he can make his audience look in the wrong place at crucial moments.
\nOnly the American people can now stop the imminent slaughter and the imposition of a global
\nfascist police state, but they are currently sleepwalking into their own enslavement. It may
\nhttp:\/\/www.serendipity.li\/wot\/aa11.htm
\n3 of 5
\nalready be too late. But maybe if enough Americans get out their videos and their remote controls
\n(pardon the pun) and take a long hard look at that remarkable footage of that plane hitting the
\nNorth Tower, then an armed and outraged middle America might just pull it off.
\nHah! Just in is this priceless piece of evidence \u2014 the Fireman’s Video in QuickTime, good
\nenough to see the action and with frame forward and backward capacity too!
\nMore Incredible Evidence
\nIt concerns Flight 175, the jet which hit WTC2, the South Tower.
\nIf you have copies of the various shots of Flight 175 hitting
\nWTC2 they’re worth looking at again. In particular there’s one bit
\nof footage of this incident where the camera is facing the south
\nside of WTC2, the side that took the impact. In this footage you
\ncan see the plane bank sharply seconds before impact and you
\ncan also see it actually penetrate the building.
\nIf you pause the tape just before it strikes you can see that the
\nplane is carrying an anomalous device on its right wing, very
\nclose to the fuselage. It almost looks like a third engine and is
\nconnected by tubing to the tail section. The video (use your
\npause and frame forward buttons again) shows that, just as the plane’s nose strikes the building
\nthis device fires a jet of flames, a split-second before the explosion starts. I wonder what this
\ndevice can be?
\nThe dark stripe down the side is
\nnot part of the paintwork (check
\nout the United Airlines livery)
\nbut the shadow of the device
\nand its pipework. In the last
\nsecond or two the plane banks
\nso much to the left that the sun
\n(to the right of the picture)
\ncatches the plane’s underside
\nand the mystery objects cast
\nshadows. Start perhaps with the
\nsilvery ‘lump’ tucked, so to
\nspeak, in the plane’s right ‘armpit’. What is that? Note too that if you look closely, what I call the
\nnozzle is not part of the plane’s own outline but is separate from it. And on the video this nozzle
\ncan be seen firing a jet of flame, just before it penetrates the building.
\nIt’s interesting to note that the two plane crashes into the two towers
\nwere very different from one another. The first crash, seen in the
\nFireman’s Video, was a rather modest affair. After the initial
\nexplosion the smoke and flames die down quickly and such flames as
\nthere are are reddish in color. The second plane on the other hand
\ncauses a vast spectacular yellow fireball and the resultant fire in the
\nhttp:\/\/www.serendipity.li\/wot\/aa11.htm
\n4 of 5
\nbuilding is much more extensive and intense than that caused by the
\nfirst. Given that both planes were supposed to be 767s, were both
\nflying from Boston to the West coast and had both been in the air for
\naround 45 minutes before they crashed, this is rather strange because
\nthey should have both been carrying roughly the same amount of fuel.
\nAs the Fireman’s Video shows, the first plane was not a 767 and it
\nfired missiles to create most of the damage. The rather small fireball
\nand fire was probably due to the fact that it had very little fuel on
\nboard. The second plane doesn’t fire missiles (well, the world’s media was in place by then) but
\nthe explosion it creates is clearly very fuel-rich indeed. There are several eyewitness reports that
\nmention the smell of fuel in the air after this plane crashes. I suspect that this plane was
\nabsolutely full of fuel, a flying fuel-tank, hence the mighty fireball. So the object on the right
\nwing is probably an ignition device, triggered just as the plane strikes, to ensure that the fuel
\nexplodes as required.
\nWhen Flight 175 took off from Boston at 8:13 a.m. it is rather unlikely that there was such an
\nignition device attached to the plane, since it would surely have been visible to anyone observing
\nits departure. Therefore the plane which hit the South Tower was not the plane which took off
\nfrom Boston. This point has been in more detail elsewhere.
\nThe terrorist attacks on 9-11 are unique in at least one regard. As far as I can tell they are the
\nonly terrorist incidents to have been played out right under the noses of a waiting media. I
\nbelieve this was no accident. The incidents were timed and sequenced to ensure that this was the
\ncase. The first crash (which we were most definitely not meant to see) brought the media to the
\nWTC and ensured plenty of cameras were trained on the towers in time for the next crash around
\n15 minutes later. So we all see the second crash in all its glory, from every conceivable angle.
\nSpectacular isn’t it? And of course even more cameras were around by the time the towers
\nmagnificently and apocalyptically collapsed an hour later. I believe that the cinematic brilliance
\nof these shots was a major objective of the overall operation. Remember how we were practically
\nforce-fed these images for two whole days, so everyone saw them hundreds of times? This is
\ninvaluable propaganda and brain-washing.
\nIt’s important to remember that if there’s one thing that Americans are really better at doing than
\nanyone else on the planet it’s making movies. Big, spectacular movies.They understand better
\nthan anyone the immense potential of the moving image to inform, entertain and suggest. Above
\nall they know how to manipulate and guide our emotions through film. They use this knowledge
\nand skill whenever they can and I believe 9-11 is only the most recent instance.
\nAs in the case of Flight 11, video footage of Flight 175 again reveals the hand of the magician
\nand the movie maker. It seems to me that close examination of these two pieces of video proves
\nbeyond all reasonable doubt that 9-11 was a sophisticated military operation for which only the
\nUS itself could be responsible. The evidence is irrefutable and would stand up in a court of law.
\nWhile Bush is in power there will be no such court case. What the hell do we do now?
\n\u2014 Leonard Spencer<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In trying to piece together what really happened on September 11, a lot of work has been done \u2014 much of it useful and interesting \u2014 into those ‘hijacked’ flights for which the publicly-available evidence is sketchy and contradictory. There are web sites for instance wholly dedicated to investigating the true fate of Flight 93 … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “the TRUTH about 9\/11”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":526,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"slim_seo":{"title":"the TRUTH about 9\/11 - Say NO to NWO","description":"In trying to piece together what really happened on September 11, a lot of work has been done \u2014 much of it useful and interesting \u2014 into those 'hijacked' flight"},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-9","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/526"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65,"href":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9\/revisions\/65"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/whosreallyrunningtheworld.blogtown.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}